North American Doubles

Ranking Criteria

(Revised-September 19, 2006)

 

As North American doubles tournaments have proliferated in both number and participants, there has been an increased need for a ranking system to both recognize accomplishment and importantly to help tournament directors seed their events more accurately. Accordingly, a formulaic ranking system has been created to include both Canadian and United States events.

 

The rankings will be presented for North America in total and for the United States. The system has the following characteristics:

 

      A player will obtain a ranking if he/she wins a minimum of one round in a main draw sanctioned event. Rankings take into account the best four (4) results of a player over the past two (2) years from all sanctioned approved play (includes play in different divisions). To obtain a ranking in the MEN�S OPEN, a player requires a minimum of 3 results.

 

      Rankings are based on total accumulated points from the four best results over the course of a two-season revolving cycle. Points are allocated by tournament results:

                 Champion = 60

                 Finalist = 45

                 Semi-finalist = 30

                 Quarter finalist = 15

                 Round of 16 = 5

                 ¾ Playoff = add 5

                 Consolation Winner = add 5

 

Points for the current year are valued @ 100% and @ 75% for the previous year. The total accumulated points are divided by 4 to determine a player�s current standing. A player may be ranked in more than one division provided he has played at least one event in that division over the 2-year period.

 

      Each draw of each age category will be weighted by age and depth of draw.

 

      AGE WEIGHTING commences at a value of 1.1 for OPEN, .88 for Age 30 years, and .64 for 40 years. All older age categories will be weighted at 80% of the value of the previous division. For example, points earned in the 55�s are worth 80% of the same points earned in the 50�s. This process enables players moving up a division in the two-year period to carry results forward into the new division.

 

      STRENGTH OF DRAW Weighting. Each division is assigned a �strength of draw� factor based on the rankings of each player as of the start of the tournament entered in the draw. That factor is multiplied by the points earned in the division.  All sanctioned draws commence with a .5 weighting and are subject to the following increases if players ranked in the top 21 are entered up to a maximum of 2.5 except in the case of an Open draw with Ranked ISDA players the maximum allowed weighting is 3.

 

#1 & 2= player= .2 each        .40

#3 & 4=players=. 175 each    .35

#5 & 6=players= .150 each    .30

#7-11=players= .1                 .50

#12-16 players= .05              .25

#17-21 player= .04               .20

         Total                                     2.00

 

Therefore in a draw where 21 of the top ranked players on the North American Ranking system all played, the draw would be weighted as a 2.5.

 

ISDA players with no established NA Ranking, will use the most current ISDA Ranking as of the month of the event, with the following weighting:

#1-6= .25 each                       1.5   

#7-12= .20 each                     1.0

Total                                     2.5

 

      The Ranking Committee retains a degree of discretion to account for players/teams with an established history but insufficient data. From .20 to .35 may be added in the case of a wild card player who does not or has not played sufficient events. The maximum of 2.5 strength of draw weighting factor per event (except OPEN with ISDA players which is 3.0) may not be exceeded by the inclusion of wild card players.

 

 

Ranking Committee:

Canada: Lolly Gillen (Chair), Pat Richardson, Sandra Shaw,

Tom Nederpel

US Squash : Mike McGorry (Chair), Tom Poor & Alan Grant